112 Days Before The Super Bowl UPDATE

I've done some additional work on the whole
112 days before the Super Bowl thing...

UPDATED RAW DATA at the end of the post.

In my previous post I told you what all SB winners
did, whether they won, lost, tied, or didn't play, on the Sunday
that was 112 days before their SBs...

Now I've added what each SB LOSER did on the Sunday
112 days prior to their SBs, and I've added the general game times
of both the SB winners and SB losers...

As for game times I either did MNF (Monday Night Football),
and these are games that were 111 days + the end date before
the Super Bowl, 1PM, 4PM, or 8PM, although some of the
exact times are different, e.g. 1:05PM or 8:25PM etc, and a few
that were like 12:30PM or 7:30PM, well I just rounded.


SB WINNER PLAYING IN THE 4PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
played the late game, the 4PM game, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

10 times

...10 out of 48 or 20% of the time.


If we add in the 8PM time slot then it's:

11 times

...11 out of 48 or 22% of the time.


Now, if we also add in the MNF games, remembering that these
are the ones that were 111 days + the end date prior to the SB,
then it is:

15 times

...15 out of 48 or 31 % of the time.


SB WINNER PLAYING IN THE 1PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
played the early game, the 1PM games, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

28 times

...28 out of 48 or 58% of the time.


So it seems far more likely that the SB winner plays
in the 1PM time slot on the Sunday that is 112 days
prior to the SB, as opposed to the late games slot.


SB WINNER WINNING IN THE 1PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
has played in the 1PM slot AND WON, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

24 times

...24 out of 48 or 50% of the time.

So, this year, week 6, there are NINE 1PM games...
barring any ties there will be NINE WINNERS,
and you could say there's a 50% chance ONE of those
nine will WIN the SB...

SB LOSER WINNING IN THE 1PM SLOT
out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB LOSER,
has played in the 1PM slot, AND WON, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

17 times

...17 out of 48 or 35% of the time.


I'm not good with percentages. This year, week 6,
we have nine 1PM games... barring ties we'll have nine winners...

...50% of the time in history one of those winners wins the SB, and,
...35% of the time in history one of those winners loses the SB, so,
why doesn't that mean that you could look at those nine winners
from the 1PM slot this year and say it's an 85% chance at least
ONE of them will be in the SB? Or can you?


SB WINNER LOSING IN THE 1PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
has played in the 1PM slot, AND LOST, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

4 times

...4 out of 48 or 8% of the time.

SB LOSER LOSING IN THE 1PM SLOT
out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB LOSER,
has played in the 1PM slot, AND LOST, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

3 times

...3 out of 48 or 6% of the time.

BOTH SB TEAMS PLAYING IN THE 1PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, BOTH SB TEAMS,
both played in the 1PM slot, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

12 times

...12 out of 48 or 25% of the time.

and of those 12, 7 times BOTH teams WON
and 5 times ONE won and ONE lost.

Never did both lose. So if the SB match up this year
comes from two of the nine week 6 losers, that would be a first.


SB WINNER WINNING IN THE 4PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
has played in the 4PM slot, AND WON, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

6 times

...6 out of 48 or 12% of the time.

SB WINNER LOSING IN THE 4PM SLOT
out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
has played in the 4PM slot, AND LOST, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

3 times

...3 out of 48 or 6% of the time.


and that means,
out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
has played in the 4PM slot, AND TIED, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

1 time

...1 time out of 48 or 2% of the time.


SB LOSER WINNING, losing, tieing, IN THE 4PM SLOT
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB LOSER,
has played in the 4PM slot, AND WON, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

12 times

...12 out of 48 or 25% of the time.

and they LOST on the 112 days Sunday in the 4PM slot:

4 times

...4 out of 48 or 8% of the time

and they TIED on the 112 days Sunday in the 4PM slot:

1 time

...1 out of 48 or 2% of the time.


BOTH SB TEAMS PLAYED THE 4PM Slot
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, BOTH SB TEAMS,
have played in the 4PM slot, on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

3 times

...3 out of 48 or 6% of the time.

all 3 times BOTH teams WON.

So this year, week 6, if the SB match up comes from
the three 4PM losers, that would be a first.


SB WINNER/LOSER PLAYING MNF
Out of 48 SBs with game times recorded, the SB WINNER,
has played on MNF, and 111 days + end date
prior to their SB:

4 times

...4 out of 48 or 8% of the time.


...and the SB LOSER has done it,

5 times

...5 out of 48 or 10% of the time.


extra note- of those 9 total times,
4 have been for prime numbered SBs...


GENERAL SB LOSER STUFF
The SB LOSER has played and WON on the Sunday that was
112 days prior to their SB:

38 times.

played and LOST

10 times.

played and TIED

1 time.

and didn't even play
3 times (1 due to strike, 2 due to BYE week)


and like the WINNERS, the SB LOSER very rarely
is on a .500 or losing record after the 112 days Sunday...

it's happened like twice in modern era.


SOOOOO... basically, if after week 6 this year,
if a team has played on that Sunday and win or lose
comes out of it with a .500 or losing record, they are
probably not making the SB.

for a team in that situation, that LOSES on that 112 days Sunday,
for them to go and WIN the SB, that would be
the first...

but for a team in that situation, that LOSES on that Sunday
to even just make the SB, it's only happened twice before.
(SB20 and SB30)


Man there's so much more we could do with this.
But anyway...

here's the raw data, and cheers!

Super Bowl 1
112 days prior [9/25/66 week 3] [NO GAME TIMES LISTED]
Green Bay WON, beat the Rams 24-13 (37 total, PD: 9) improved to 3-0
Kansas City WON, beat the Patriots 43-24 (67, PD: 19) improved to 3-0

Super Bowl 2
112 days prior [9/24/67 week 2] [NO GAME TIMES LISTED]
Green Bay WON, beat the Bears 13-10 (23, PD: 3) improved to 1-0-1
Oakland DID NOT PLAY, were on BYE week

Super Bowl 3
112 days prior [9/22/68 week 2] [NO GAME TIMES LISTED]
New York Jets WON, beat the Patriots 47-31 (78, PD: 16) improved to 2-0
Baltimore WON, beat the Falcons 28-20 (48, PD: 8) improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 4
112 days prior [9/21/69 week 2] [NO GAME TIMES LISTED]
Kansas City WON, beat the Patriots 31-0 (31, PD: 31) improved to 2-0
Minnesota LOST to the Giants 23-24 (47, PD: 1) fell to 0-1

Super Bowl 5
112 days prior [9/28/70 week 2] **111 days + end date**
Baltimore LOST to the Chiefs 24-44 (68, PD: 20) MNF fell to 1-1
--^--no 112s in date, or date numerologies, or anything--^--
Dallas WON, beat the Giants [9/27/70] 28-10 (38, PD: 18) 1PM improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 6
112 days prior [9/26/71 week 2]
Dallas WON, beat the Eagles 42-7 (49, PD: 35) 1PM improved to 2-0
Miami WON, beat the Bills 29-14 (43, PD: 15) 1PM improved to 1-0-1

Super Bowl 7
112 days prior [9/24/72 week 2]
Miami WON, beat the Oilers 34-13 (47, PD: 21) 1PM improved to 2-0
Washington WON, beat the Cardinals 24-10 (34, PD: 14) 1PM improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 8
112 days prior [9/23/73 week 2]
Miami LOST to the Raiders,7-12 (19, PD: 5) 4PM fell to 1-1
--^--first straight LOSS on straight 112 days before SB--^--
Minnesota WON, beat the Bears 22-13 (35, PD: 9) 1PM improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 9
112 days prior [9/22/74 week 2]
Pittsburgh TIED the Broncos 35-35 (70) 4PM fell to 1-0-1
Minnesota WON, beat the Lions 7-6 (13, PD: 1) 1PM improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 10
112 days prior [9/28/75 week 2]
Pittsburgh LOST to the Bills 21-30 (51, PD: 9) 4PM fell to 1-1
Dallas WON, beat the Cardinals 37-31 OT (68, PD: 6) 1PM improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 11
112 days prior [9/20/76 week 2] **111 days + end date**
Oakland WON, beat the Chiefs 24-21 (45, PD: 3) MNF improved to 2-0
--^--no 112s in date, or date numerologies, or anything--^--
Minnesota TIED the Rams [9/19/76] 10-10 (20) 4PM fell to 1-0-1

Super Bowl 12
112 days prior [9/25/77 week 2]
Dallas WON, beat the Giants 41-21 (62, PD: 20) 1PM improved to 2-0
Denver WON, beat the Bills 26-6 (32, PD: 20) 4PM improved to 2-0

Super Bowl 13
112 days prior [10/1/78 week 5]
Pittsburgh WON, beat the Jets 28-17 (45, PD: 11) 1PM improved to 5-0
Dallas LOST to the Redskins 5-9 (14, PD: 4) [10/2/78] MNF fell to 3-2 **111 days + end date**

Super Bowl 14
112 days prior [9/30/79 week 5]
Pittsburgh LOST to the Eagles 14-17 (31, PD: 3) 1PM fell to 4-1
LA Rams WON, beat the Cardinals 21-0 (21) 4PM improved to 3-2

Super Bowl 15
112 days prior [10/5/80 week 5]
Oakland LOST to the Chiefs 17-31 (48, PD: 14) 4PM fell to 2-3
Philadelphia WON, beat the Redskins 24-14 (38, PD: 10) 1PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 16
112 days prior [10/4/81 week 5]
San Francisco WON, beat the Redskins 30-17 (47, PD: 13) 1PM improved to 3-2
Cincinnati LOST to the Oilers 10-17 (27, PD: 7) 1PM fell to 3-2

Super Bowl 17
112 days prior [10/10/82]
THE NFL DID NOT PLAY... STRIKE

Super Bowl 18
112 days prior [10/2/83 week 5]
Oakland LOST to the Redskins 35-37 (72, PD: 2) 1PM fell to 4-1
Washington WON, beat the Rams 37-35 (72, PD: 2) 1PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 19
112 days prior [9/30/84 week 5]
San Francisco WON, beat the Falcons 14-5 (19, PD: 9) 4PM improved to 5-0
Miami WON, beat the Cardinals 36-28 (64, PD: 8) 1PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 20
112 days prior [10/6/85 week 5]
Chicago WON, beat the Buccaneers 27-19 (46, PD: 8) 1PM improved to 5-0
New England LOST to the Browns 20-24 (44, PD: 4) 1PM fell to 2-3

Super Bowl 21
112 days prior [10/5/86 week 5]
New York Giants WON, beat the Cardinals 13-6 (19, PD: 7) 1PM improved to 4-1
Denver WON, beat the Cowboys 29-14 (43, PD: 15) 4PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 22
112 days prior [10/11/87 week 5]
Washington WON, beat the Giants 38-12 (50, PD: 26) 4PM improved to 3-1
Denver WON, beat the Raiders 30-14 (44, PD: 16) [10/12/87] MNF improved to 2-1-1 **111 days

Super Bowl 23
112 days prior [10/2/88 week 5]
San Francisco WON, beat the Lions 20-13 (33, PD: 7) 4PM improved to 4-1
Cincinnati WON, beat the Raiders 45-21 (63, PD: 24) 4PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 24
112 days prior [10/8/89 week 5]
San Francisco WON, beat the Saints 24-20 (44, PD: 4) 4PM improved to 4-1
Denver WON, beat the Chargers 16-10 (26. PD: 6) 4PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 25
112 days prior [10/7/90 week 5]
New York Giants DID NOT PLAY, were on BYE WEEK
-----did not win on 10/12 or anything like that-----
Buffalo WON, beat the Raiders 38-24 (62, PD: 14) 8PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 26
112 days prior [10/6/91 week 6]
Washington WON, beat the Bears 20-7 (27, PD: 13) 1PM improved to 6-0
Buffalo LOST to the Chiefs 6-33 (39, PD: 27) [10/7/91] MNF fell to 5-1 **111 days + end date**

Super Bowl 27
112 days prior [10/11/92 week 6]
Dallas WON, beat the Seahawks 27-0 (27) 1PM improved to 4-1
Buffalo LOST to the Raiders 3-20 (23. PD: 17) 4PM fell to 4-2

Super Bowl 28
112 days prior [10/10/93 week 6]
Dallas WON, beat the Colts 27-3 (30, PD: 24) 1PM improved to 3-2
Buffalo WON, beat the Oilers 35-7 (42, PD: 28) [10/11/93] MNF improved to 4-1 **111 days

Super Bowl 29
112 days prior [10/9/94 week 6]
San Francisco WON, beat the Lions 27-21 (48, PD: 6) 1PM improved to 4-2
San Diego WON, beat the Chiefs 20-6 (26, PD: 14) 4PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 30
112 days prior [10/8/95 week 6]
Dallas WON, beat the Packers 34-24 (58, PD: 10) 1PM improved to 5-1
Pittsburgh LOST to the Jaguars 16-20 (36, PD: 4) 1PM fell to 3-3

Super Bowl 31
112 days prior [10/6/96 week 6]
Green Bay WON, beat the Bears 37-6 (43, PD: 31) 1PM improved to 5-1
New England WON, beat the Ravens 46-38 (84, PD: 8) 1PM improved to 3-2

Super Bowl 32
112 days prior [10/6/97 week 6] **111 days + end date**
Denver WON, beat the Patriots 34-13 (47, PD: 21) MNF improved to 6-0
--^--no 112s in date, or date numerologies, or anything--^--
Green Bay WON, beat the Buccs 21-16 (37, PD: 5) [10/5/97] 1PM improved to 4-2

Super Bowl 33
112 days prior [10/11/98 week 6]
Denver WON, beat the Seahawks 21-16 (37, PD: 5) 4PM improved to 6-0
Atlanta WON, beat the Giants 34-20 (54, PD: 14) 8PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 34
112 days prior [10/10/99 week 5]
St. Louis WON, beat the 49ers 42-20 (62, PD: 22) 1PM improved to 4-0
Tennessee WON, beat the Ravens 14-11 (25, PD: 3) 4PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 35
112 days prior [10/8/00 week 6]
Baltimore WON, beat the Jaguars 15-10 (25, PD: 5) 8PM improved to 5-1
New York Giants WON, beat the Falcons 13-6 (19, PD: 7) 4PM improved to 4-2

Super Bowl 36
112 days prior [10/14/01 week 5]
New England WON, beat the Chargers 29-26 OT (55, PD: 3) 1PM improved to 2-3
St. Louis WON, beat the Giants 15-14 (29, PD: 1) 1PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 37
112 days prior [10/6/02 week 5]
Tampa Bay WON, beat the Falcons 20-6 (26, PD: 14) 1PM improved to 4-1
Oakland WON, beat the Bills 49-31 (80, PD: 18) 1PM improved to 4-0

Super Bowl 38
112 days prior [10/12/03 week 6]
New England WON, beat the Giants 17-6 (23, PD: 11) 1PM improved to 4-2
Carolina WON, beat the Colts 23-20 OT (43, PD: 3) 1PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 39
112 days prior [10/17/04 week 6]
New England WON, beat the Seahawks 30-20 (50, PD: 10) 1PM improved to 5-0
Philadelphia WON, beat the Panthers 30-8 (38, PD: 22) 1PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 40
112 days prior [10/16/05 week 6]
Pittsburgh LOST to the Jaguars 17-23 OT (40, PD: 6) 1PM fell to 3-2
Seattle WON, beat the Texans 42-10 (52, PD: 32) 8PM improved to 4-2

Super Bowl 41
112 days prior [10/15/06 week 6]
Indianapolis DID NOT PLAY, were on BYE WEEK
-----did not win on 10/12 or anything like that-----
Chicago WON, beat the Cardinals 24-23 (47, PD: 1) [10/16/06] MNF improved to 6-0 **111 days

Super Bowl 42
112 days prior [10/15/07 week 6] **111 days + end date**
New York Giants WON, beat the Falcons 31-10 (41, PD: 21) MNF improved to 4-2
-----no 112s in date, or date numerologies, or anything-----
New England WON, beat the Cowboys 48-27 (75, PD: 21) [10/14/07] improved to 6-0

Super Bowl 43
112 days prior [10/12/08 week 6]
Pittsburgh DID NOT PLAY, were on BYE WEEK
Arizona WON, beat the Cowboys 30-24 (54, PD: 6) 4PM improved to 4-2

Super Bowl 44
112 days prior [10/18/09 week 6]
New Orleans WON, beat the Giants 48-27 (75, PD: 19) 1PM improved to 5-0
Indianapolis DID NOT PLAY, were on BYE week

Super Bowl 45
112 days prior [10/17/10 week 6]
Green Bay LOST to the Dolphins 20-23 OT (43, PD: 3) 1PM fell to 3-3
Pittsburgh WON, beat the Browns 28-10 (38, PD: 18) 1PM improved to 4-1

Super Bowl 46
112 days prior [10/16/11 week 6]
New York Giants WON, beat the Bills 27-24 (51, PD: 3) 1PM improved to 4-2
New England WON, beat the Cowboys 20-16 (36, PD: 4) 4PM improved to 5-1

Super Bowl 47
112 days prior [10/14/12 week 6]
Baltimore WON, beat the Cowboys 31-29 (60, PD: 2) 1PM improved to 5-1
San Francisco LOST to the Giants 3-26 (29, PD: 23) 4PM fell to 4-2

Super Bowl 48
112 days prior [10/13/13 week 6]
Seattle WON, beat the Titans 20-13 (33, PD: 7) 4PM improved to 5-1
Denver WON, beat the Jaguars 35-19 (54, PD: 16) 4PM improved to 6-0

Super Bowl 49
112 days prior [10/12/14 week 6]
New England WON, beat the Bills 37-22 (59, PD: 15) 1PM improved to 4-2
Seattle LOST to the Cowboys 23-30 (53, PD: 7) 4PM fell to 3-2

Super Bowl 50
112 days prior [10/18/15 week 6]
Denver WON, beat the Browns 26-23 OT (49, PD: 3) 1PM improved to 6-0
Carolina WON, beat the Seahawks 27-23 (50, PD: 4) 4PM improved to 5-0

Super Bowl 51
112 days prior [10/16/16 week 6]
New England WON, beat the Bengals 35-17 (52, PD: 18) 1PM improved to 5-1
Atlanta LOST to the Seahawks 24-26 (50, PD: 2) 4PM fell to 4-2

Super Bowl 52
112 days prior [10/15/17 week 6]
Philadelphia DID NOT PLAY... played Thursday that week 8PM
-----won on 10/12 (112) during week 6-----
New England WON, beat the Jets 24-17 (31, PD: 7) 1PM improved to 4-2